Comparing two language versions of an agreement

PROFESSIONAL PERSPECTIVE

An agreement should retain its meaning in every language version.

A joint project may begin with a short letter or a memorandum. Once timelines, resources and responsibilities enter the picture, every provision matters: who undertakes to act, what counts as performance and which matters still need the parties’ agreement.

When working on international agreements, I compare the document with the intended cooperation. The starting point is understanding how the participants expect to work together. The text can then be checked against that model, from identifying the parties to managing changes and bringing the arrangement to an end.

I pay particular attention to the Ukrainian and English versions. Similar words can describe an obligation, a possibility or a condition differently. My task is to identify and explain differences in meaning, then propose consistent wording for the parties to consider.

When to enquire

A partner has sent a draft

You need to understand the obligations in the document, identify what is unclear and decide which questions to raise in negotiations. Appendices and correspondence recording key terms may also be relevant to the review.

Terms have been discussed informally

There is a shared idea and several email exchanges, but no complete document. The next step is to bring the terms together, distinguish agreement from aspiration and consider whether a contract, memorandum or another cooperation document is appropriate.

The language versions differ

Ukrainian and English texts were prepared separately or amended at different times. They need to be compared for consistency of terms and for differences that may change the obligations or the way decisions are approved.

The project changes after signing

Participants, activities or their sequence have changed. The existing agreement needs to be reviewed to determine how amendments can be documented and how a new text will fit the arrangements already in place.

Scope of assistance

Structure and risk review

I review the parties, subject matter, obligations and arrangements for approving deliverables and changes. I record inconsistencies, omissions and missing information, explaining how they may affect the particular project.

Document drafting

I prepare an agreement, memorandum or other document within the agreed scope. The drafting distinguishes commitments from intentions and from terms that still depend on a further decision by the participants.

Language alignment

I compare the substance of the Ukrainian and English provisions, align terminology and cross-references, and flag differences. Proposed changes are accompanied by an explanation of what they mean for the parties.

Reviewing comments

I organise the partner’s comments and propose alternative wording. An issues table makes it clear which points have been resolved and which still require a business decision or further verification.

The process

  1. Understand the intended arrangement

    You explain the participants, purpose, stage of negotiations and required decision date. I clarify the available material and agree the questions to be addressed.

  2. Review the starting documents

    I examine the versions and related documents provided. I raise questions that the text alone cannot answer; you confirm the relevant factual and organisational information.

  3. Consider the proposed wording

    I prepare a draft or amendments with explanations. You decide which terms are acceptable, and further comments are addressed within the agreed scope of work.

  4. Bring the text together

    I deliver the agreed files and a list of any open issues. If the partner subsequently changes the wording before signature, that final version should be reviewed separately.

Deliverables

  • A written review identifying the priority decisions.
  • A draft agreement or a marked-up version with explanations.
  • Aligned wording and a record of unresolved differences.

The scope depends on the parties, the document and its applicable law. Questions of another jurisdiction’s law require separate input from an appropriate specialist; working with an English text does not, in itself, constitute foreign-law advice.

The volume of material, number of revisions and communication arrangements should be agreed before work begins. Legal analysis supports a decision but cannot determine whether a partner will accept the proposed terms.

Questions & answers

Can I ask about a single provision?

Yes. An initial request can concern a particular clause. Understanding it may still require the full agreement, its appendices and related definitions. The extent of that review is agreed in advance.

Is the English version enough to start?

Yes, for an initial discussion. If a Ukrainian version or other drafts exist, please mention them: consistency between texts cannot be established without comparing them.

What should I include in my first email?

Describe the type of document, the participants without unnecessary personal details, the languages, the negotiation stage and your main question. Agree how to exchange larger files and confidential appendices before sending them.

Related reading

Research and teaching publications

A bibliography of work on law, professional language and international documents, with authors, dates, publication status and available sources.

Publications

Related practice areas

THE NEXT STEP

Discuss a document

Briefly describe the situation so we can identify the relevant area and consider how I may help.

Discuss your enquiry